Have you ever wondered how video evidence is handled in legal proceedings? Whether you find yourself caught up in a legal dispute or simply have an interest in understanding the rules surrounding video evidence, we’ll provide you with an explanation of New Jersey’s statute on this matter. We’ll break down the key points of the rule to help you navigate the complexities of the legal system.
Criminal Defense Lawyers
Facing criminal charges in New Jersey? Don’t face the legal system alone. Contact The Law Offices of Jonathan F. Marshall today at (877) 534-7338 or online. With over 200 years of combined experience, our team of 11 dedicated criminal defense attorneys, including former prosecutors, will fight for your rights. We have top-rated attorneys recognized by the National Trial Lawyers and Super Lawyers Rising Stars. Trust in our skills, with less than 1% of attorneys in the state holding the distinction of being Certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a Criminal Trial Attorney. Your future is important, so reach out to us now for a consultation.
N.J.R.E. 1001: Definitions
To start, let’s clarify some important terms. Under N.J.R.E. 1001, “writings” refers to any recorded information, including audio and video recordings. Similarly, “photographs” encompass various forms of visual reproductions, such as still photographs, X-ray films, videos, footage from security cameras, motion pictures, and similar images. The definition of an “original” refers to the primary version of a writing or photograph, including the actual physical copy or its digital equivalent. On the other hand, a “duplicate” refers to any copy or reproduction that accurately replicates the original.
N.J.R.E. 1002: Requirement Of Original
According to this rule, if you want to present the content of a writing or photograph as evidence (present video evidence), the original document or image is generally required. However, there are exceptions to this rule, which we’ll explore in subsequent sections.
N.J.R.E. 1003: Admissibility Of Duplicates
In certain situations, duplicates can be admitted as evidence just like the original. However, if there is a legitimate question concerning authenticity of the original or if the admission of the duplicate would not be fair, the court may decide against accepting the duplicate as evidence.
N.J.R.E. 1004: Admissibility Of Other Evidence Of Contents
Sometimes, presenting the original writing or photograph as evidence may not be feasible or necessary. The rule allows for alternative evidence of the content if any of the following conditions are met:
- All the originals have been lost or destroyed, as long as the proponent (the party presenting the evidence) did not act in bad faith.
- It is impossible to obtain the original through legal means or any other available process.
- The party against whom the evidence is offered had prior notice about the content and failed to produce the original.
- The writing or photograph is not directly relevant to the main issue at hand, and it would be impractical to require its production.
N.J.R.E. 1005: Public Records
When it comes to official records or documents filed in a public office, copies of these records can be used as evidence if they meet certain conditions. The copy must be certified as correct or testified to be correct by a witness who has compared it with the original. If obtaining a copy is not possible despite reasonable efforts, other evidence can be presented to prove the content.
N.J.R.E. 1006: Summaries
In situations where a large volume of writings or photographs is involved, it may be impractical to present each individual piece of evidence. In such cases, a qualified witness can provide a summary, chart, or calculation based on the content of the documents. But the originals or the duplicates have to be made available for an examination or for other parties to copy upon request.
N.J.R.E. 1007: Testimony Or Written Statement Of Party
If the party against whom the evidence is offered admits to the content of a writing or photograph, it can be proven through their testimony, deposition, or written statement. In this scenario, there is no need to produce the original document.
N.J.R.E. 1008: Functions Of Court And Jury
Typically, it is the responsibility of the court to determine whether the conditions for admitting alternative evidence of content are met. However, in jury trials, the jury itself decides certain factual issues related to the existence of a document, the authenticity of a presented writing or photograph, or the accuracy of evidence reflecting the content of the original.
FAQ
Is It Possible To Have A Copy Of Video Evidence Presented In Court?
Yes, according to N.J.R.E. 1003, a duplicate (copy) of a video is generally admissible to the same extent as the original, unless there are doubts about its authenticity or admitting the duplicate would be unfair.
What If The Original Video Recording Has Been Lost Or Destroyed?
N.J.R.E. 1004 allows for the use of other evidence to prove the contents of a video if all the originals have been lost or destroyed, as long as the proponent did not act in bad faith.
Can I Use A Summary Or Chart Based On Video Evidence?
Yes, N.J.R.E. 1006 permits the use of summaries, charts, or calculations presented by a qualified witness when dealing with a large volume of video evidence. However, the originals or duplicates must be made available for examination by other parties upon request.
What If The Original Video Is In The Possession Of The Opposing Party?
If the opposing party had prior notice about the content of the video and fails to produce the original, N.J.R.E. 1004(c) allows for the use of other evidence to prove its contents.
Are Public Records Videos Treated Differently?
No, public records videos are subject to the same rules as other writings and photographs. N.J.R.E. 1005 states that copies of official records or writings recorded or filed in a public office can be used as evidence, provided they meet certain conditions.
Do I Need To Present The Original Video If I Admit Its Contents?
No, according to N.J.R.E. 1007, if you admit to the content of a video, it can be proven through your testimony, deposition, or written statement, without the need to produce the original video.
Who Determines Whether Alternative Evidence Of Video Content Is Admissible In Court?
In general, the court determines whether the conditions for admitting alternative evidence of video content are fulfilled, as stated in N.J.R.E. 1008. However, in a jury trial, the jury itself decides certain factual issues related to the existence of the video, the authenticity of a presented video, or the accuracy of evidence reflecting the content of the original video.
Get in Touch With an Experienced New Jersey Criminal Defense Lawyer
If you have been charged with a crime in New Jersey and are concerned about video footage or witness testimony, don’t face the legal system alone. Contact The Law Offices of Jonathan F. Marshall today and let our team of experienced lawyers fight for your rights. With over 200 years of combined experience, our dedicated criminal defense attorneys are ready to take on prosecutors and work tirelessly to secure the best possible outcome for you. Our firm boasts a team of 11 attorneys who specialize exclusively in criminal law, including seven former prosecutors with extensive knowledge of the inner workings of the justice system.
Additionally, we have multiple attorneys recognized by the National Trial Lawyers Top 100 or Top 40 Under 40, and two of our lawyers were recently selected to the prestigious Super Lawyers Rising Stars 2021 list for New Jersey. Furthermore, we take pride in having an attorney who is Certified by NJ Supreme Court as a Criminal Trial Attorney, which is a distinction that is held by less than 1% of attorneys in the State. Don’t wait another moment, call us at (877) 534-7338 or contact us online to schedule your consultation. Your future is at stake, and we are here to help you navigate through the legal challenges ahead.
Discover more about the criminal process in New Jersey.
